MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190306355 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3103509

Efficient Inter-Cloud Authentication and Micropayment Protocol for IoT Edge Computing

2021· article· en· W3190306355 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Seifelnasr, Riham AlTawy, Amr Youssef

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNotationComputer scienceMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a$\textsf {S}$ymmetric$\textsf {K}$ey$\textsf {I}$nter-$\textsf {C}$loud$\textsf {A}$uthentication and redeemable micropayment$\textsf {P}$rotocol ($\textsf {SKICAP}$) for IoT-Edge computing applications. The proposed protocol takes into account the mobile and limited resource nature of IoT devices by enabling them to register with their home cloud admin for computation offloading service provided by foreign Edge-Cloud instances. More precisely,$\textsf {SKICAP}$ensures that mobile IoT devices can be authenticated and serviced by edge nodes outside of their home cloud coverage, while guaranteeing the associated charge redemption. Additionally, since our protocol considers the mobile and anywhere deployable requirements of IoT devices, we utilize physical unclonable function and cryptographic hash function to make it privacy-preserving and resilient to hardware compromise. Under the assumption of an indistinguishably secure physical unclonable function, we provide a formal security analysis of our protocol. Finally, we report$\textsf {SKICAP}$performance on an ARM Cortex-A72 processor, and compare it with other closely related protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207