Extracting RLC Parasitics From a Flexible Electronic Hybrid Assembly Using On-Chip ESD Protection Circuits
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of RLC line parasitics in a flexible hybrid electronic assembly can lead to signal integrity issues, and their progression over time can lead to catastrophic failures. A technique for extracting the RLC line parasitics from a flexible hybrid electronics assembly is presented. The proposed extraction method exploits the on-chip ESD protection circuits of an IC chip to extract the parasitics of the printed conductors bonded to the chip. This is performed through a single test access port, i.e., two test points. While the parasitics LC are extractable through one-port reflection-based techniques such as time domain reflectometry; the parasitic R requires a two-port measurement such as Kelvin test, which is extremely difficult to perform for printed conductors bonded to small surface-mount IC package devices. The accuracy of the extracted RLC parameters with the proposed method are verified with a prototype developed on a rigid FR4 substrate. Subsequently, the proposed technique is utilized to track the variation of the RLC parasitics for prototypes developed on Kapton Polyimide substrate subjected to different forms of bending.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it