MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190320221 · doi:10.5194/essd-2021-214

Global distribution of wastewater treatment plants and their released effluents into rivers and streams

2021· article· en· W3190320221 on OpenAlexafffund
Heloisa Ehalt Macedo, Bernhard Lehner, Jim A. Nicell, Günther Grill, Jing Li, Antonio Limtong, Ranish Shakya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversiteit UtrechtMcGill University
KeywordsEffluentEnvironmental scienceOutfallSewage treatmentWastewaterPollutantSTREAMSContaminationPopulationGeospatial analysisSurface waterStreamflowEnvironmental engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementDrainage basinGeographyEcologyComputer scienceRemote sensingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The main objective of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is to remove contaminants such as pathogens, nutrients, and organic and other pollutants from wastewaters using physical, biological and/or chemical processes prior to discharge into receiving waterbodies. However, since WWTPs cannot remove all contaminants, they inevitably represent concentrated point sources of residual contaminant loads into surface waters. To understand the severity and extent of the impact of wastewater discharges from such facilities into rivers and lakes, as well as to identify opportunities of improved management, detailed information about WWTPs is required, including (1) their explicit geospatial locations to identify the waterbodies affected; and (2) individual plant characteristics such as population served, flow rate of effluents, and level of treatment of processed wastewaters. These characteristics are especially important for contaminant fate models that are designed to assess the distribution of substances that are not typically included in environmental monitoring programs, such as contaminants of emerging concern. Although there are several regional datasets that provide information on WWTP locations and characteristics, data are still lacking at a global scale, especially in developing countries. Here we introduce HydroWASTE, a location-explicit global database of 58,502 WWTPs and their characteristics. This database was developed by combining national and regional datasets with auxiliary information to derive or complete missing WWTP characteristics, including the amount of people served. A high-resolution river network with streamflow estimates was used to georeference WWTP outfall locations and calculate each plant’s dilution factor (i.e., the ratio of the natural discharge of the receiving waterbody to the WWTP effluent discharge). The utility of this information was demonstrated in an assessment of the distribution of wastewaters at a global scale. Results show that 1.2 million kilometers of the global river network receive wastewater input from upstream WWTPs, of which more than 90,000 km are downstream of WWTPs that offer only primary treatment. Wastewater ratios originating from WWTPs exceed 10 % in over 72,000 km of rivers, mostly in areas of high population densities in Europe, USA, China, India, and South Africa. In addition, 2,533 plants show a dilution factor of less than 10, which represents a common threshold for environmental concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207