MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190387715 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.262459

First In Vivo and Phantom Imaging of Cyclotron-Produced <sup>133</sup>La as a Theranostic Radionuclide for <sup>225</sup>Ac and <sup>135</sup>La

2021· article· en· W3190387715 on OpenAlexafffund
Bryce J. B. Nelson, Simon Ferguson, Melinda Wuest, John S. Wilson, M. John M. Duke, Susan Richter, Hans Soenke-Jans, Jan Andersson, Freimut D. Juengling, Frank Wuest

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesNorthern Alberta Institute of TechnologyAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsRadiochemistryPhysicsNuclear medicineChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theranostic isotope pairs have gained recent clinical interest as they can be labeled to the same tracer and applied for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The goals of this study were to A) investigate cyclotron production of clinically relevant 133La activities using natural and isotopically enriched barium target material, B) compare fundamental positron emission tomography (PET) phantom imaging characteristics of 133La with common PET radionuclides, and C) demonstrate in vivo preclinical PET tumor imaging using 133La-PSMA-I&T. Methods:133La was produced on a 24 MeV cyclotron using an aluminum-indium sealed target with 150-200 mg of isotopically enriched 135BaCO3, natBaCO3, and natBa metal. A NEPTIS Mosaic-LC performed Ba/La separation. DOTA, PSMA-I&T, and macropa were radiolabeled with 133La. Derenzo and National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) phantom imaging was performed with 133La, 132La, and 89Zr and compared with 18F, 68Ga, 44Sc, and 64Cu. In vivo preclinical imaging was performed with 133La-PSMA-I&T in LNCaP tumor-bearing mice. Results: Proton irradiations for 100 µA·min at 23.3 MeV yielded 214 ± 7 MBq 133La and 28 ± 1 MBq 135La using 135BaCO3, 59 ± 2 MBq 133La and 35 ± 1 MBq 135La using natBaCO3 and 81 ± 3 MBq 133La and 48 ± 1 MBq 135La using natBa metal. At 11.9 MeV, 135La yields were: 81 ± 2 MBq, 6.8 ± 0.4 MBq, and 9.9 ± 0.5 MBq for 135BaCO3, natBaCO3, and natBa metal. BaCO3 target material recovery was 95.4 ± 1.7%. NEMA and Derenzo phantom imaging demonstrated 133La PET spatial resolution, and scanner recovery coefficient were superior compared to 68Ga, 132La, and comparable to 89Zr. The apparent molar activity was 130 ± 15 GBq/μmol with DOTA, 73 ± 18 GBq/μmol with PSMA-I&T, and 206 ± 31 GBq/μmol with macropa. Preclinical PET imaging with 133La-PSMA-I&T provided high-resolution tumor visualization with a SUV60min of 0.97 ± 0.17. Conclusion: With high-yield 133La cyclotron production, recovery of BaCO3 target material, and superior fundamental imaging characteristics compared to 68Ga and 132La, 133La represents a promising radiometal candidate to provide high-resolution PET imaging as a PET/alpha therapy theranostic pair with 225Ac, or a PET/Auger electron therapy theranostic pair with 135La.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207