Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis quelques annees, la prothese maxillofaciale (PMF), jusqu'alors branche phare des matieres odontostomatologiques par sa specificite prothetique et son ancrage medicochirurgical, etend son domaine d'activites a de nombreuses disciplines. De nombreuses ouvertures s'offrent a present a la PMF : psychosociales (par la creation d'unites de prise en charge psychosociales), scientifiques (avec les progres en reconstitution et reconnaissance faciales), mais aussi culturelles de par son integration aux ecoles doctorales dans le domaine des sciences humaines et sociales. C'est a travers ce dernier volet que les auteurs, en s'interessant aux representations antiques du visage, souhaitent faire partager les resultats de leur recherche en anatomie artistique et en anthropologie culturelle. Ainsi, ils ont pu mettre en evidence l'existence de resonances socioculturelles a travers de nombreuses representations faciales allant, pour les plus anciennes, de l'Egypte antique, jusqu'aux aux icones chretiennes (coptes, byzantines et russes).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.982 | 0.982 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".