Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis quelques annees, la prothese maxillofaciale (PMF), jusqu'alors branche phare des matieres odontostomatologiques par sa specificite prothetique et son ancrage medicochirurgical, etend son domaine d'activites a de nombreuses disciplines. De nombreuses ouvertures s'offrent a present a la PMF : psychosociales (par la creation d'unites de prise en charge psychosociales), scientifiques (avec les progres en reconstitution et reconnaissance faciales), mais aussi culturelles de par son integration aux ecoles doctorales dans le domaine des sciences humaines et sociales. C'est a travers ce dernier volet que les auteurs, en s'interessant aux representations antiques du visage, souhaitent faire partager les resultats de leur recherche en anatomie artistique et en anthropologie culturelle. Ainsi, ils ont pu mettre en evidence l'existence de resonances socioculturelles a travers de nombreuses representations faciales allant, pour les plus anciennes, de l'Egypte antique, jusqu'aux aux icones chretiennes (coptes, byzantines et russes).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 1.000 | 0.996 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".