MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190505389 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24281

Improved bilayer convolution transfer learning neural network for industrial fault detection

2021· article· en· W3190505389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing Wang, Wenqian Zhang, Haiyan Wu, Jinglin Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransfer of learningComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkFault detection and isolationArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkFault (geology)GeneralizationConvolution (computer science)Machine learningData-drivenDomain (mathematical analysis)Benchmark (surveying)Pattern recognition (psychology)ActuatorMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Machine learning methods have achieved outstanding results in the fault detection of industrial processes when the training and test data follow the same distribution or originate from the same situation. However, the pre‐trained detection model fails when the operation status changes or unknown fault occurs during the actual production. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel bilayer convolutional transfer learning neural network (BCTLNN) to improve the generalization of detection model. BCTLNN is a bilayer network (local and global level) in order to extract the fault features. Transfer learning strategies (fine‐tuning and domain adaptation) are introduced to learn the domain invariant features by minimizing the divergence between different domain data. Experiments on the benchmark bearing data and the agglomeration fault data from an actual polyethylene process are employed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207