MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190530595 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2021.3119321

Vector Single-Source Surface Integral Equation for TE Scattering From Cylindrical Multilayered Objects

2021· preprint· en· W3190530595 on OpenAlexaff
Zekun Zhu, Xiaochao Zhou, Zhizhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAdmittanceScatteringSurface (topology)MathematicsMathematical analysisBoundary (topology)Integral equationSingular integralEquivalence (formal languages)Transverse planeFunction (biology)GeometryPhysicsOpticsPure mathematicsElectrical impedanceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single-source surface integral equation (SS-SIE) for transverse electric (TE) scattering from cylindrical multilayered objects is proposed in this article. By incorporating the differential surface admittance operator (DSAO) and recursively applying the surface equivalence theorem from innermost to outermost boundaries, an equivalent model with only electric current density on the outermost boundary can be obtained. In addition, an integration approach is proposed, where the small argument expansion of the Hankel function is used to evaluate the singular and nearly singular integrals. Compared with other SIEs, such as the Poggio–Miller–Chang–Harrington–Wu–Tsai (PMCHWT) formulation, the computational expenditure is reduced for multilayered structures because only a single source is needed on the outermost boundary. As shown in the numerical results, the proposed method generates only 19% of unknowns, uses 26% of memory, and requires 29% of the CPU time of the PMCHWT formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207