Immune Regulation of Intestinal Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation in <i>Drosophila</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Intestinal progenitor cells integrate signals from their niche, and from the gut lumen, to divide and differentiate at a rate that maintains an epithelial barrier to microbial invasion of the host interior. Despite the importance of evolutionarily conserved innate immune defenses to maintain stable host-microbiota relationships, we know little about specific contributions of stem cell immunity to gut homeostasis. We used the Drosophila model to determine the consequences of compromised intestinal stem cell immune activity for epithelial homeostasis. We showed that loss of stem cell immunity greatly impacted growth and renewal in the adult gut. In particular, we noticed that inhibition of stem cell immunity impeded key growth and differentiation events in the progenitor cell compartment leading to a gradual loss of stem cell numbers with age, and an impaired differentiation of mature enteroendocrine cells. Our results highlight the importance of immune signaling in the stem cell population for epithelial function in the adult gut. HIGHLIGHTS The TNFR-like Immune Deficiency (IMD) pathway is active in Drosophila intestinal progenitor cells. Inhibition of IMD in progenitors impairs progenitor cell proliferation. Blocking progenitor cell IMD negatively affects generation of mature epithelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".