Sincretismo apuleyano-lucianesco para un cambio de paradigma hacia la novela moderna (con calas en el pensamiento estético de Cervantes y Quevedo)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo ofrece un análisis circunscrito a la recepción de El Asno de oro en la narrativa española áurea con énfasis en el sincretismo apuleyano-lucianesco como cambio de paradigma hacia la novela moderna. Atendiendo a esta pervivencia de notoria influencia en el humanismo europeo, destacados autores españoles de la prosa de ficción de mediados del siglo XVI trazaron renovados caminos de experimentación estética que van a preludiar la originalidad del pensamiento narrativo de Cervantes y Quevedo. Especial relieve adquiere, por último, la difusión que tuvo la edición de El Asno de oro impresa en Medina del Campo en 1543, no solo a mediados del siglo XVI sino también en época contemporánea gracias a su inclusión en los Orígenes de la novela por Marcelino Menéndez Pelayo, contribuyendo así a la vigencia y recepción crítica de este clásico universal hasta nuestros días.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".