MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190600454 · doi:10.1016/j.refiri.2021.100231

Perspectives des professionnels de la santé et des patients/familles au sein d’une unité de soins intensifs adultes : enquêtes de terrain sur le bruit

2021· article· fr· W3190600454 on OpenAlexaff
Karen St-Pierre, Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme Gallani, Brigitte Martel, Normand Dufour, Stéphanie Dupuis, Julie Asselin, Frédéric Douville, Clémence Dallaire

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Francophone Internationale de Recherche Infirmière · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de QuébecHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue Francophone Internationale de Recherche InfirmièreSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207