MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190673287 · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2021.06.018

International consensus-based policy recommendations to advance universal palliative care access from the American Academy of Nursing Expert Panels

2021· article· en· W3190673287 on OpenAlexaff
William E. Rosa, Harleah G. Buck, Allison Squires, Sharon Kozachik, Huda Abu‐Saad Huijer, Marie Bakitas, Juli McGowan Boit, Patricia K. Bradley, Pamela Z. Cacchione, Garrett K. Chan, Nigel Crisp, Constance Dahlin, Pat Daoust, Patricia M. Davidson, Sheila Davis, Myrna Doumit, Regina M. Fink, Keela Herr, Pamela S. Hinds, Tonda L. Hughes, Viola Karanja, Deborah J. Kenny, Cynthia R. King, Hester C. Klopper, Ann R. Knebel, Ann Kurth, Elizabeth A. Madigan, Pamela Malloy, Marianne Matzo, Polly Mazanec, Salimah H. Meghani, Todd B. Monroe, Patricia Moreland, Judith A. Paice, J. Craig Phillips, Cynda Hylton Rushton, Judith Shamian, Mona Shattell, Julia Snethen, Connie M. Ulrich, Dorothy Wholihan, Lucia D. Wocial, Betty Ferrell

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Outlook · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Nursing ResearchNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPalliative careNursingContext (archaeology)MedicineNurse educationGovernment (linguistics)Health carePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.181
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.239
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1810.239
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0110.012
Research integrity0.0360.041
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNursing OutlookSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207