Courrier « féminin » ? Les normes de genre selon Colette dans La Presse, 1922–19561
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qu’est-ce qui rend un courrier « féminin » ? Pour Kimberly Voss, c’est la prédominance des thèmes reliés au « 4F » (food, fashion, family and furnishing) 2 . En histoire de la presse féminine, il s’agit de publications faites par, pour et sur les femmes 3 . Le « Courrier de Colette », page féminine de La Presse, de 1903 à 1956, entre dans ces définitions tout en les dépassant. Bien que construisant et renforçant des normes de genre, Colette, pseudonyme d’Édouardina Lesage, aborde une variété de sujets : la mode, les manières d’entretenir la maison, les conflits au sein de la famille, l’étiquette, le fonctionnement de la société, les emplois, la littérature, l’histoire, la géographie et une multitude d’autres questions anodines 4 . Recevant entre 100 et 400 lettres par jour à l’apogée de sa popularité, la journaliste gère des problèmes de coeur et répond aux interrogations de tous les lecteurs et toutes les lectrices de La Presse qui lui envoient une missive 5 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".