MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190831190

LIFE AND SCIENTIFIC HERITAGE OF A.ZH. MASHANOV

2020· article· ru· W3190831190 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anara G. Shabambaeva, Б.Н. Абдрахманов

Bibliographic record

VenueВЕСТНИК «Исторические и социально-политические науки» · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKazakhBulgarianArabicQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryIndependence (probability theory)Identity (music)ClassicsAncient historyArchaeologyArtPhilosophyLinguisticsAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article discusses the life and scientific heritage of Akzhan Zhaksybekovich Mashanov, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, professor, corresponding member of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR, honored worker of Kazakhstan, who during his lifetime received the high name of “al-Farabi of the 20th century”. The creative path of a real scientist, vigorous social activity began in the second quarter of the 20th century - during the difficult period of the struggle of the Kazakh people for independence and freedom, the awakening and rising of national identity.The scientist is widely known not only in Kazakhstan and Soviet science, but also in the global scientific community. His works cover a wide range of subjects of professional interest, such as geology, mining, history, archeology, farabi studies, theology. He spoke Arabic, Old Turkic, Hebrew and a number of other languages. He studied the works of al-Farabi in the primary sources and made a huge contribution to their popularization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВЕСТНИК «Исторические и социально-политические науки»Same topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207