MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190867324 · doi:10.3389/fresc.2021.709978

A Narrative Review of Function-Focused Measures for Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders

2021· review· en· W3190867324 on OpenAlexafffund
Kajaani Shanmugarajah, Peter Rosenbaum, Mohammad Zubairi, Briano Di Rezze

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersHamilton Health Sciences
KeywordsNarrativeNarrative reviewPsychologyFunction (biology)Developmental psychologyPsychotherapistLinguisticsGeneticsPhilosophyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical measures in health and rehabilitation settings are often used to examine child functioning to better support the diverse needs of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and their families. The WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework reflects a focus of health beyond biomedical deficits, using the concept of functioning to create opportunities for measurement development involving this construct. In the measures developed in the field of childhood NDD, it is unclear whether and how these tools measure and incorporate the ICF framework and its domains within health care contexts. Understanding how these measures utilize the ICF will enable researchers and clinicians to operationalize function-focused concepts in studies and clinical practice more effectively. This narrative review aims to identify and describe function-focused measures that are based on the ICF for children with NDD, as described in the peer-reviewed literature. This review used a systematic search strategy with multiple health-focused databases (Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, EMCARE), and identified 14 clinical measures that provide direct support for children (aged 0-21) with NDD in pediatric health (and other) settings. Results described the measures that were primarily developed for three main diagnostic populations [cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, and communication disorders]; had varying contextual use (clinical-only or multiple settings); and for which authors had conducted psychometric tests in the measure's initial development studies, with the most common being content validity, interrater reliability, test-retest reliability. Participation (79%, n = 11) & Activities (71%, n = 10) were the most common ICF domains captured by the set of measurement tools. Overall (71%, n = 10) of the identified measures utilized multiple ICF domains, indicating that the “dynamic nature” of the interactions of the ICF domains was generally evident, and that this result differentiated from “linking rules,” commonly used in research and clinical practice. The implications of these findings suggest that clinical measures can be an effective application of the ICF's defined concepts of functioning for children with NDD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0150.015
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Rehabilitation SciencesSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207