MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190885595 · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.646465

Constrained-Spherical Deconvolution Tractography in the Evaluation of the Corticospinal Tract in Glioma Surgery

2021· article· en· W3190885595 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiyuan Sheng, Jinliang Yu, Zhongcan Chen, Yong Sun, Xingyao Bu, Meiyun Wang, Can Sarica, Juha Hernesniemi, Bradley J. Nelson, Ajmal Zemmar, Josué M. Avecillas-Chasín

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersETH Zürich FoundationHenan Provincial People's HospitalEidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
KeywordsTractographyCorticospinal tractFractional anisotropyDiffusion MRIGliomaMedicineSuperior longitudinal fasciculusWhite matterPrecentral gyrusMotor cortexBrain tumorNuclear medicineRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tractography has demonstrated utility for surgical resection in the setting of primary brain tumors involving eloquent white matter (WM) pathways. Methods: Twelve patients with glioma in or near eloquent motor areas were analyzed. The motor status was recorded before and after surgery. Two different tractography approaches were used to generate the motor corticospinal tract (CST): Constrained spherical deconvolution probabilistic tractography (CSD-Prob) and single tensor deterministic tractography (Tens-DET). To define the degree of disruption of the CST after surgical resection of the tumor, we calculated the percentage of the CST affected by surgical resection, which was then correlated with the postoperative motor status. Moreover, the fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) of the CST generated by the CSD-Prob and the Tens-DET was measured and compared between the ipsilesional and contralesional side. Results: The CST was identified in all patients and its trajectory was displaced by the tumor. Only the CSD-Prob approach showed the CST with the characteristic fan-like projections from the precentral gyrus to the brainstem. Disruption of the CST was identified in 6/6 with postoperative motor deficit by CSD-Prob approach and in 5/6 in the Tens-DET. The degree of disruption was significantly associated with the motor deficit with the CSD-Prob approach (rho = −0.88, p = 0.021). However, with the Tens-DET approach the CST disruption did not show significant association with the motor function (rho = −0.27, p = 0.6). There was a significant decrease in FA (p = 0.006) and a significant increase in MD (p = 0.0004) and RD (p = 0.005) on the ipsilesional CST compared with the contralesional CST only with the CSD-Prob approach. Conclusion: CSD-Prob accurately represented the known anatomy of the CST and provided a meaningful estimate of microstructural changes of the CST affected by the tumor and its macrostructural damage after surgery. Newer surgical planning stations should include advanced models and algorithms of tractography in order to obtain more meaningful reconstructions of the WM pathways during glioma surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in SurgerySame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207