Les services d’accueil aux immigrants francophones en Colombie-Britannique : expériences ethniques différenciées et mobilités plurielles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le recrutement et l’accueil des immigrants francophones est un enjeu important pour les communautés francophones en situation minoritaire soucieuses de maintenir leur poids démographique et d’assurer leur dynamisme. Dans cet article, nous nous appuyons sur les résultats d’une recherche comparative visant à faire un bilan prospectif des services d’accueil aux immigrants francophones dans les territoires et les provinces de l’Ouest canadien. L’analyse des données montre un recours différencié aux services d’accueil en fonction de l’intersection de différents marqueurs sociaux : des expériences de mobilités sociales plurielles, un sentiment d’isolement face à des services spécialisés qui ne répondent que partiellement à des défis globaux, et l’expérience d’une triple marginalisation pour les participants issus de l’Afrique sub-saharienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".