A novel approach to evaluate alpha-synuclein seeding shows a wide heterogeneity in multiple system atrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Several in vitro and in vivo findings have consistently shown that α-synuclein derived from multiple system atrophy (MSA) subjects has more seeding capacity than Parkinson’s disease-derived α-synuclein. However, reliable detection of α-synuclein derived from MSA using seeded amplification assays, such as the Real-Time Quaking-induced Conversion, has remained challenging. Here we demonstrate that the interaction of the Thioflavin T dye with α-synuclein from MSA and Parkinson’s disease patients can be modulated by the type of salt, pH, and ionic strength used to generate strain-specific reaction buffers. Employing this novel approach, we have generated a streamlined Real-Time Quaking-induced Conversion assay capable of categorizing MSA brains according to their α-synuclein seeding behavior, and to unravel a previously unrecognized heterogeneity in seeding activity between different brain regions of a given individual that goes beyond immunohistochemical observations and provide a framework for future molecular subtyping of MSA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".