MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191016408 · doi:10.1061/9780784483602.006

Developing a Survivor Curve for Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe

2021· article· en· W3191016408 on OpenAlexaff
Rabia Mady

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsCIMA+ (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServiceability (structure)Mains electricityPrestressed concreteLimit state designStructural engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringGeotechnical engineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP) is widely used to construct large diameter water mains. These water mains usually have a high importance of failure, and any unexpected service interruptions from a PCCP failure may place a significant burden on the pipe owner. Utilizing the classic risk-based approach that multiplies the consequence of the failure by the probability of failure to generate an overall risk, as part of the PCCP asset management strategy, is governed by the PCCP probability of failure (POF) rather than the PCCP consequence of failure when critical transmission water mains are in question. Therefore, it is paramount to inspect and assess PCCP based on advanced state-of-the-art technologies to estimate the physical condition of the PCCP and use these inspection findings to develop a survivor curve that considers the pipe deterioration level and the pipe POF at each deterioration stage. This paper presents a method of interpreting PCCP composite stiffness measurements, which is an indicator of PCCP deterioration, and estimates the POF at each degradation stage by using the PCCP yield limit criteria. Limit states design as per AWWA C304 (serviceability, damage, and strength) will be assessed based on laminated composite plate theory and plotted on the survivor curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2021Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207