MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191141159 · doi:10.1002/adem.202100623

Thermal Properties of Laser‐Fabricated Copper–Carbon Composite Films on Polyimide Substrate

2021· article· en· W3191141159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolyimideMaterials scienceComposite numberGraphiteCopperFabricationSubstrate (aquarium)Composite materialThermal conductivityElectrical conductorThermal stabilityLaserFlexible electronicsPulsed laser depositionThin filmChemical engineeringNanotechnologyMetallurgyLayer (electronics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for highly efficient heat management in flexible electronics requires fabrication of highly conductive flexible films. Herein, Cu–C film on a polyimide (PI) substrate is fabricated to form a layered Cu–C/PI composite conductive film using direct laser writing. Its oxidation resistance is significantly improved compared with the written Cu film due to the presence of a graphite shell on Cu particles in the Cu–C film. Furthermore, the Cu–C/PI composite film shows better thermal properties than Cu/PI. This work provides a one‐step method for rapidly fabricating Cu/PI and Cu–C/PI composites with good thermal stability and conductivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it