Dynamic Parameters-Based Reversible Data Transform (RDT) Algorithm in Recommendation System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protection and processing of the sensitive data in recommendation system are the major concern. Existing literature, used homomorphic encryption (HE), Reversible Data Transform (RDT), differential privacy (DP) and many more schemes to protect user information. Existing RDT scheme require prior sharing of the parameters and an alternative mechanism e.g., Shamir Threshold Protocol or Diffie-hellman algorithm are used to protect the sharing parameters. In this paper, we proposed a chaotic based RDT approach for privacy-preserving data mining (PPDM) in recommendation system. Using this approach, RDT parameter values will be generated locally and because of this, prior sharing of the parameter values for the recovery process will not be necessary. This approach can be used as an alternative to the standard-RDT algorithm where bandwidth and memory are considered important factors. Our results on the Iris data set clearly show that the proposed chaotic RDT shows similar results as standard-RDT. Secondly, in this paper, we explore the usage of the RDT algorithm on real app usage records in the mobile app recommendation (MAR) domain. Thirdly, we tested the application of the RDT algorithm for the standard MovieLens dataset to ensure the validity of results because app usage dataset is publicly not available. Our results show that the proposed RDT algorithm can replace HE if an adaptive recommendation approach is used. Similarly, we can safely use the RDT approach to any data including user rating, health data or app usage frequency to ensure user privacy before delivering it to the recommender-server.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".