MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191268479 · doi:10.82308/52788

The role of culture in Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) disclosure experiences from the perspectives of youth

2020· article· en· W3191268479 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megan Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual abusePsychologyCriminologySocial psychologyChild abuseChild sexual abuseDevelopmental psychologyPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are three main gaps within the child sexual abuse (CSA) disclosure literature that this thesis aims to address namely 1) the absence of diverse populations in children and adolescents’ under study for CSA disclosure, 2) the lack of focus on how culture impacts help CSA disclosure processes and finally 3) the omission of the voices of youth broadly, in the CSA literature. Groundwork has been laid in regard to the influence of culture on CSA disclosure. However, culture has often been framed in reference to, and/or synonymous with, demographic categories. These categorizations of culture in the CSA literature provide some insights into the experiences of specific groups. However, the insights gained are juxtaposed against the study of culture as a monolithic entity and fails to provide a rich analysis of culture as being an interactional component in people’s lives. Therefore, the role of culture in CSA disclosure requires ongoing research; more specifically seminal authors in the field of culture and CSA Fontes and Plummer (2010) argued CSA research is needed that expands beyond categorizations which includes numerous facets of culture. The goal of this thesis is to gain an in-depth understanding of the role of culture in CSA disclosures among a culturally diverse population of youth. Grounded from a framework of cultural psychology, this thesis answered the following research questions: (1) how culture has been studied thus far in relation to disclosure of CSA; (2) how culture shaped experiences of CSA disclosure from the perspectives of youth and (3) what common cultural themes emerged as promoting or inhibiting CSA disclosure. The first manuscript is a systematic review of existing literature and concluded that: (1) “culture” has been largely been framed to date with categorical descriptors of ethnicity or religion and (2) some CSA disclosure barriers transcended the ethnic and racial categorizations and were grouped into nine themes: the code of silence, cultural shame, fear of the police or the justice system, family preservation, historical oppression and trauma, lack of resources, protection of the offender, fear of retribution and gender roles. Manuscripts two and three were both based on a qualitative study that involved nine sexually abused youth from diverse cultural backgrounds in Ottawa, Canada. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted to gather data from participants. Descriptive psychological phenomenology was used as research methodology to gather, organize and analyze data to formulate conclusions. The second manuscript was informed by the research question, “how does culture shape experiences of CSA disclosure from the perspectives of youth”, and concluded: The results of the study in regard to the research question revealed that: (1) participants narratives of culture extend beyond categorizations (2) culture determined how participants understood CSA and how they trusted others to disclose (3) disclosure was a process and finally (4) cultural beliefs shifted as a result of CSA experiences.. The conclusions of the third manuscript, were informed by the research question, “what common themes emerged as promoting or inhibiting disclosure, in relation to culture?” concluded: (1) common cultural barriers to disclosure included: lack of sexual education, lack of support, mistrust of authority and intrapersonal feelings around the abuse and (2) more unique barriers related to culture were identified as social economic status, facing discrimination through the lifespan, communal environments, religious beliefs and female oppression. This thesis’ findings highlight the importance for researchers, clinicians, and recipients of disclosure alike to build rapport that is inclusive of understanding victims’ culture. Furthermore, people in positions of authority such as police and child protection workers need to be acutely aware of the role of power dynamics across different cultures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicGlobal Socioeconomic and Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207