MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3191268479 · doi:10.82308/52788

The role of culture in Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) disclosure experiences from the perspectives of youth

2020· article· en· W3191268479 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megan Simpson

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSexual abusePsychologyCriminologySocial psychologyChild abuseChild sexual abuseDevelopmental psychologyPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicineMedical emergency

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There are three main gaps within the child sexual abuse (CSA) disclosure literature that this thesis aims to address namely 1) the absence of diverse populations in children and adolescents’ under study for CSA disclosure, 2) the lack of focus on how culture impacts help CSA disclosure processes and finally 3) the omission of the voices of youth broadly, in the CSA literature. Groundwork has been laid in regard to the influence of culture on CSA disclosure. However, culture has often been framed in reference to, and/or synonymous with, demographic categories. These categorizations of culture in the CSA literature provide some insights into the experiences of specific groups. However, the insights gained are juxtaposed against the study of culture as a monolithic entity and fails to provide a rich analysis of culture as being an interactional component in people’s lives. Therefore, the role of culture in CSA disclosure requires ongoing research; more specifically seminal authors in the field of culture and CSA Fontes and Plummer (2010) argued CSA research is needed that expands beyond categorizations which includes numerous facets of culture. The goal of this thesis is to gain an in-depth understanding of the role of culture in CSA disclosures among a culturally diverse population of youth. Grounded from a framework of cultural psychology, this thesis answered the following research questions: (1) how culture has been studied thus far in relation to disclosure of CSA; (2) how culture shaped experiences of CSA disclosure from the perspectives of youth and (3) what common cultural themes emerged as promoting or inhibiting CSA disclosure. The first manuscript is a systematic review of existing literature and concluded that: (1) “culture” has been largely been framed to date with categorical descriptors of ethnicity or religion and (2) some CSA disclosure barriers transcended the ethnic and racial categorizations and were grouped into nine themes: the code of silence, cultural shame, fear of the police or the justice system, family preservation, historical oppression and trauma, lack of resources, protection of the offender, fear of retribution and gender roles. Manuscripts two and three were both based on a qualitative study that involved nine sexually abused youth from diverse cultural backgrounds in Ottawa, Canada. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted to gather data from participants. Descriptive psychological phenomenology was used as research methodology to gather, organize and analyze data to formulate conclusions. The second manuscript was informed by the research question, “how does culture shape experiences of CSA disclosure from the perspectives of youth”, and concluded: The results of the study in regard to the research question revealed that: (1) participants narratives of culture extend beyond categorizations (2) culture determined how participants understood CSA and how they trusted others to disclose (3) disclosure was a process and finally (4) cultural beliefs shifted as a result of CSA experiences.. The conclusions of the third manuscript, were informed by the research question, “what common themes emerged as promoting or inhibiting disclosure, in relation to culture?” concluded: (1) common cultural barriers to disclosure included: lack of sexual education, lack of support, mistrust of authority and intrapersonal feelings around the abuse and (2) more unique barriers related to culture were identified as social economic status, facing discrimination through the lifespan, communal environments, religious beliefs and female oppression. This thesis’ findings highlight the importance for researchers, clinicians, and recipients of disclosure alike to build rapport that is inclusive of understanding victims’ culture. Furthermore, people in positions of authority such as police and child protection workers need to be acutely aware of the role of power dynamics across different cultures

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,037

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,009
Communication savante0,0100,005
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,201
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Même sujetGlobal Socioeconomic and Political DynamicsTravaux en français237 207