MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191275196 · doi:10.29103/j-mind.v6i1.4875

ANALISIS POTENSI FINANCIAL DISTRESS DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN ALTMAN Z SCORE PADA PERUSAHAN PENERBANGAN (DAMPAK PANDEMI COVID-19 DENGAN PENUTUPAN OBJEK WISATA DAN PSBB)

2021· article· en· W3191275196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Rizal Affandi, Rita Meutia

Bibliographic record

VenueJ-MIND (Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBankruptcyStock exchangeBusinessFinancial distressQuarter (Canadian coin)Financial systemFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to identify and analyze the potential for financial distress in airlines at Indonesia. The object of this research is the airlines listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), namely PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk and PT. AirAsia Indonesia Tbk. The data used is in the form of financial reports that have been published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange through the website (www.idx.co.id) in the first quarter of 2020 – third quarter of 2020. The data analysis technique uses the Altman Z Score in predicting potential financial distress. The results of the study found that PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk and PT AirAsia Indonesia Tbk were in financial distress or in an unhealthy financial condition, and were classified as companies that have the potential to experience bankruptcy. Research shows that PT AirAsia Indonesia Tbk has a higher potential for bankruptcy than PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJ-MIND (Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia)Same topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207