MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191302124 · doi:10.1061/9780784483619.044

San Patricio Water Transmission Pipeline—Multiple Pipe Solutions

2021· article· en· W3191302124 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey LeBlanc, J.A. Schwarz, Luke Fontenot

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsPrairie Bible InstituteThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Pipeline transportBiddingPurchasingWater pipePipeProcess (computing)Civil engineeringJoint (building)Computer scienceEngineeringEnvironmental scienceConstruction engineeringMechanical engineeringBusinessOperations managementMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to keep up with demand, San Patricio Municipal Water District (SPMWD) evaluated options ranging from increasing treatment capacity to purchasing additional treated water directly from the City of Corpus Christi. After discussions with industrial customers regarding required water quality and quantity, it was decided the way forward was to supplement its existing treated water capacity with additional purchase water from the City of Corpus Christi. This would require a new 48 in. water transmission pipeline extended approximately 23 mi from Corpus Christi to Gregory, TX. As the consulting engineer, J. Schwarz & Associates was asked to design this pipeline with four different pipe materials in mind: bar-wrapped (C303) concrete pressure pipe, ductile iron pipe, PVC, and spirally welded steel pipe. This posed to be a challenge as the variations in the pipe materials properties and joint systems require that the design address the different aspects of each material from acceptable joining methods and corrosion protection system. The paper will review this project in detail from cradle to grave covering aspects from the initial design parameters and construction documents through the bidding process and construction completion. Included in this presentation will also be lessons learned through the design and construction process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2021Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207