MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191365954 · doi:10.17762/de.vi.3297

GA-BASED IMPROVEMENT HEURISTIC FOR MINIMIZING MAKESPAN IN A GENERAL FLOW-SHOP SCHEDULING PROBLEM

2021· article· en· W3191365954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsJob shop schedulingFlow shop schedulingMathematical optimizationHeuristicConstructiveComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Permutation (music)Upper and lower boundsNull-move heuristicAlgorithmMathematicsProcess (computing)Routing (electronic design automation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study proposes an evolutionary algorithm-based improvement heuristic for the permutation flow-shop problem. The method uses a constructive heuristic to arrive at a good first solution. The GA-based improvement heuristic is used in conjunction with CDS, Gupta's algorithm, and Palmer's Slope Index, which are all well-known constructive heuristics. The method is put to the test on a series of ten issues that vary from 4 to 25 tasks and 4 to 30 machines. The outcomes are also compared to some of the most well-known lower-bound options

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it