Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vancouver's public system is deeply related to social welfare policies, and it’s operated on a community unit. ‘Community Plan’ is a detailed execution plan for Vancouver City Planning and serves as a concrete guideline for the community. It seeks diversity by differentiating local assets and characteristics from each plan, but ultimately aims at improving the quality of life of the community members. Urban people have felt the sense of belonging of their community by forming cultural, mental and social interactions within the scope of local living areas. However, as the age changes, people's lifestyles change. In a society where individualism is prevalent, a different relationship with the past is created. As the personal problems arising from the changes in living conditions gradually spread to the problems of society, we began to look for solutions and pursued shared social values. In the modern society, the concept of 'local community' and the role of public space in the city reappear. I also analyze the relationship between public facilities and the youth space in the community. In this paper, I examine the analysis of the Vancouver Community Plan and look for possibilities in our community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it