MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191463346 · doi:10.1155/2021/9940126

At the Traffic Intersection, Stopping, or Walking? Pedestrian Path Prediction Based on KPOF-GPDM for Driving Assistance

2021· article· en· W3191463346 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xudong Long, Weiwei Zhang, Bo Zhao, Shaoxing Mo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianAdvanced driver assistance systemsOptical flowComputer scienceComputer visionIntersection (aeronautics)Artificial intelligencePedestrian detectionTrajectoryKey (lock)Hotspot (geology)SimulationReal-time computingEngineeringImage (mathematics)Transport engineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pedestrian detection has always been a research hotspot in the Advanced Driving Assistance System (ADAS) with great progress in recent years. However, for the ADAS, we not only need to detect the behavior of pedestrians in front of the vehicle but also predict future action and the motion trajectory. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a human key point combined optical flow network (KPOF-Net) in the vehicle ADAS for the occlusion situation in the actual scene. When the vehicle encounters a blocked pedestrian at a traffic intersection, we used self-flow to estimate the global optical flow in the image sequence and then proposed a White Edge Cutting (WEC) algorithm to remove obstructions and simply modified the generative adversarial network to initialize pedestrians behind the obstructions. Next, we extracted pedestrian optical flow information and human joint point information in parallel, among which we trained four human key point models suitable for traffic intersections. At last, KPOF-GPDM fusion was proposed to predict the future status and walking trajectories of pedestrians, which combined optical flow information with human key point information. In the experiment, we did not merely compare our method with other four representative approaches in the same scene sequences. We also verified the accuracy of the pedestrian motion state and motion trajectory prediction of the system after fusion of human joint points and optical flow information. Taking into account the real-time performance of the system, in the low-speed and barrier-free environment, the comparative analysis only uses optical flow information, human joint point information, and KPOF-Net three prediction models. The results show that (1) in the same traffic environment, our proposed KPOF-Net can predict the change of pedestrian motion state about 5 frames (about 0.26 s) ahead of other excellent systems; (2) at the same time, our system predicts the trajectory of the pedestrian more accurately than the other four systems, which can achieve more stable minimum error ±0.04 m; (3) in a low-speed, barrier-free experimental environment, our proposed trajectory prediction model that integrates human joint points and optical flow information has higher prediction accuracy and smaller fluctuations than a single-information prediction model, and it can be well applied to automobiles’ ADAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207