Recent advancements in pulmonary arterial hypertension and right heart failure research: overview of selected abstracts from ATS2020 and emerging COVID‐19 research
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each year the American Thoracic Society (ATS) Conference brings together scientists who conduct basic, translational and clinical research to present on the recent advances in the field of respirology. Due to the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the ATS2020 Conference was held online in a series of virtual meetings. In this review, we focus on the breakthroughs in pulmonary hypertension research. We have selected 11 of the best basic science abstracts which were presented at the ATS2020 Assembly on Pulmonary Circulation mini-symposium "What's New in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) and Right Ventricular (RV) Signaling: Lessons from the Best Abstracts," reflecting the current state of the art and associated challenges in PH. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding the mechanisms underlying RV failure, the regulation of inflammation, and the novel therapeutic targets that emerged from preclinical research. The pathologic interactions between pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular function and COVID-19 are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it