MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191597211 · doi:10.1109/cec45853.2021.9504812

An Exploration-only Exploitation-only Hybrid for Large Scale Global Optimization

2021· article· en· W3191597211 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationSelection (genetic algorithm)PopulationConvergence (economics)MetaheuristicScale (ratio)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two factors affect the effectiveness of exploration, the bias introduced by selection and the concurrence of exploration and exploitation. The Leaders and Followers metaheuristic was designed to reduce the bias from selection by using a two-population scheme. Minimum Population Search was designed to limit the concurrence of exploration and exploitation through the use of Thresheld Convergence in its sampling strategy. This paper presents Unbiased Exploratory Search, which combines both approaches and simultaneously addresses the effects of these two factors. An exploration-only exploitation-only hybrid is then presented using Unbiased Exploratory Search for the exploration-only phase of the hybrid. The hybrid is tested on the CEC large scale optimization benchmark.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it