MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191641271

Effects of acupuncture on clinical outcome and helper T cell distribution and abundance in patients with convalescent ischemic stroke.

2021· article· en· W3191641271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lingli Jin, Han Cai-yan

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCD8AcupunctureInternal medicineStroke (engine)Ischemic strokeGastroenterologyImmunologyIschemiaPathologyImmune system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of acupuncture on clinical outcomes and helper T cell levels in patients with convalescent ischemic stroke. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six patients with cerebral ischemic stroke were selected for this prospective study. Patients in the control group were treated with routine therapy, and patients in the observation group were treated with acupuncture for 30 minutes once a day for 14 days plus the treatment of the control group. The clinical efficacy, cognitive function, T cell subsets distribution and inflammatory factors of patients in both groups were recorded before and after treatment. RESULTS: cell percentage was lower (all P<0.001). Moreover, the improvement in inflammatory factors as well as scores of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in observation group were better than those of the control group (P<0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of cerebral ischemic stroke by acupuncture can improve clinical outcome and cognitive function, which may be related to its regulation of immune response and reduction of inflammation in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207