Applications of Passive GPS Data to Characterize the Movement of Freight Trucks—A Case Study in the Calgary Region of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The movement of trucks represents a significant portion of travel. Surveys have traditionally been used to measure truck movement, but this costly and limited data collection method typically involves in-person interviews and requiring high workload. This study explores different ways in which passive truck GPS data can be used to complement traditional data collection methods, for obtaining detailed information about the travel behaviors of freight trucks. First, we develop a heuristic-based model to identify truck stops. A new methodology is proposed to classify truck stops into a primary or secondary sto, which make identifying trip purposes possible. Primary stops are defined as the locations where the loading or unloading of the goods takes place. Secondary stops are those associated with all other purposes, including refueling, and driver breaks. Finally, we develop a destination choice model for modeling truck movements. This model applies a discrete choice modeling technique to distribute truck trips within the Calgary region, Canada. We test the utility function in the destination choice model to include of business establishment data, travel impedances, and other dummy variables that are likely to influence truck demand. The results show that a combination of trucks’ dwelling times and their entropy can be used to classify truck stops by purpose. This study also shows the potential of using passive GPS data to gain additional insights into truck movements characterization and truck trip distribution modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".