Improving domain adaptation in de-identification of electronic health records through self-training
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: De-identification is a fundamental task in electronic health records to remove protected health information entities. Deep learning models have proven to be promising tools to automate de-identification processes. However, when the target domain (where the model is applied) is different from the source domain (where the model is trained), the model often suffers a significant performance drop, commonly referred to as domain adaptation issue. In de-identification, domain adaptation issues can make the model vulnerable for deployment. In this work, we aim to close the domain gap by leveraging unlabeled data from the target domain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We introduce a self-training framework to address the domain adaptation issue by leveraging unlabeled data from the target domain. We validate the effectiveness on 4 standard de-identification datasets. In each experiment, we use a pair of datasets: labeled data from the source domain and unlabeled data from the target domain. We compare the proposed self-training framework with supervised learning that directly deploys the model trained on the source domain. RESULTS: In summary, our proposed framework improves the F1-score by 5.38 (on average) when compared with direct deployment. For example, using i2b2-2014 as the training dataset and i2b2-2006 as the test, the proposed framework increases the F1-score from 76.61 to 85.41 (+8.8). The method also increases the F1-score by 10.86 for mimic-radiology and mimic-discharge. CONCLUSION: Our work demonstrates an effective self-training framework to boost the domain adaptation performance for the de-identification task for electronic health records.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".