The polymorphism in Philaenus spumarius (L.) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) in British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyses the distribution and relative frequency of the morphs of Philaenus spumarius in British Columbia, the populations being drawn from different biotic areas. 1t is shown that nine morphs occur in the province and of these, marginellus occurs only in the south-west corner; marginellus and lateralis occur only as females. The frequency of the morphs in the biotic areas of the province is not uniform; populations in dry areas differ signIficantly from those in wet areas. Populations taken from the various forest areas are not identical, nor are those from coastal areas. Within a single biotic area, the frequency of morphs appears to be stable. No significant difference was determined between two samples taken sixteen years apart. Further, there appears to be no significant seasonal, daily or hourly change in the morph frequency in an area. An experiment carried out on mating individuals failed to demonstrate a tendency for non-random mating and there was no evidence for the preferential mating of the rarer types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".