MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191866368 · doi:10.5539/ass.v17n8p1

Data Analysis of Shipping Cycle in Dry Bulk Market

2021· article· en· W3191866368 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsIndex (typography)MathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dry bulk market BDI index fell from 11,793 points on May 20, 2008 to 290 points on February 10, 2016, which is a very certain "downward cycle" of the shipping market, showing an "L" shape. By citing random samples and big data, the paper analyzes the causes of the "L" type cycle. First, through random sample data, a binary measurement model with BDI index as the dependent variable and dry bulk market supply and demand as independent variables is established, and it is concluded that the "down cycle" of the dry bulk market is caused by the "supply factor"; then the paper continues to quote big data, that is, to use "whole sample" to further analyze the sub-variables of supply variables. Finally, the paper concludes that the "downward cycle" of the dry bulk shipping market is "L" shaped, which is caused by changes in the "market structure" of the shipbuilding market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207