MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191867768 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500502

Trajectory Control and Resource Allocation for UAV-Based Networks with Wireless Backhauls

2021· article· en· W3191867768 on OpenAlexaff
Minh Dat Nguyen, Long Bao Le, A. Girard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTrajectoryMathematical optimizationChannel (broadcasting)Resource allocationTrajectory optimizationWirelessConvergence (economics)Convex optimizationWireless networkHeuristicChannel allocation schemesOptimization problemResource management (computing)Linear programmingRegular polygonComputer networkOptimal controlAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the trajectory control and sub-channel assignment for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based wireless networks with wireless backhauls. This design aims to maximize the min rate achieved by ground users (GUs) subject to their data transmission demands. To tackle the underlying mixed integer non-linear optimization problem, we use the alternating optimization approach where we iteratively optimize the sub-channel assignment and UAV trajectory control until convergence. Toward this end, we propose a heuristic algorithm to obtain a feasible solution for the sub-channel assignment sub-problem. In addition, the successive convex approximation (SCA) method is used to convexify and solve the non-convex UAV trajectory control sub-problem. Via extensive numerical studies, we illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed design for different network settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207