MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191892035 · doi:10.1137/20m1328130

Formation Tracking of Nonholonomic Systems on the Special Euclidean Group under Fixed and Switching Topologies: An Affine Formation Strategy

2021· article· en· W3191892035 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Junyi Yang, Feng Xiao, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsAffine transformationNetwork topologyGroup (periodic table)Euclidean geometryNonholonomic systemEuclidean groupPure mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)CombinatoricsAffine spaceGeometryComputer scienceRobotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An affine formation tracking problem of multiple mobile agents is studied in this work. Each agent in the system is modeled as an underactuated kinematic rigid body with nonholonomic constraints, maneuvering on the special Euclidean group $(SE(3))$. A controller is designed for each agent directly on the corresponding Lie algebra of $SE(3)$. Moreover, only local information accessible to each agent in its body-fixed frame is involved. The proposed control protocol can be implemented under both directed and undirected topologies. In addition, for directed graphs, an algorithm is proposed to realize the formation under switching topologies. Finally, numerical simulations are given to illustrate the efficiency and feasibility of the proposed results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Control and OptimizationSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207