MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192011535 · doi:10.1117/12.2593673

Probing nanocrystal fluorescence dynamics from core, to surface, and beyond

2021· article· en· W3192011535 on OpenAlexaff
Minhal Hasham, Mark W. B. Wilson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanocrystalPhoton upconversionIntermittencyFluorescenceExcitonMaterials scienceChemical physicsQuantum dotInfraredOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyMolecular physicsPhysicsLuminescenceCondensed matter physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) have bright, narrow, and tunable emission across the visible and infrared. However, fundamental insight into NC photophysics is incomplete. At single-particle scales, NCs undergo fluorescence intermittency whereby photon emission switches between ON and OFF states with erratic kinetics. The range of timescales relevant to the excitonic lifecyle adds to the challenge of spectroscopically distinguishing between proposed mechanisms. Here, we demonstrate all-optical modulation of blinking statistics and discover that sub-bandgap light perturbs ON-times of NCs in a timescale-free manner. On the ensemble scale, NCs possess advantages when sensitizing spin-triplet states of surface-bound molecules for excitonic upconversion. In the energy transfer step, it remains unclear whether correlated transfer is outpaced by sequential electron transfer. Using tailored NC synthesis, we observe rich spectroscopic dynamics including the pervasive role of surface states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207