MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192034291 · doi:10.12795/futhark.2019.i14.12

Introducción Due pittrici greche nel De mulieribus claris (II): Irene

2019· article· it· W3192034291 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco José Rodríguez Mesa

Bibliographic record

VenueFuthark Revista de Investigación y Cultura · 2019
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fra le centosei biografie muliebri che compongono il De mulieribus claris di Giovanni Boccaccio si annoverano quelle di un certo gruppo di donne che spiccarono per la loro saggezza o per il loro virtuosismo in diverse arti. All’interno di questa categoria, il certaldese narra brevemente il talento di due pittrici che vissero nella Grecia dell’Antichità: Tamari, figlia di Micone (capitolo LVI), e Irene, figlia di Cratino (LIX). Il presente articolo – secondo di due studi che prendono in analisi le due vite suddette – studia le particolarità del capitolo dedicato a Irene (LIX) analizzando le fonti utilizzate dall’autore e la struttura della vita alla luce degli schemi narrativi usati dal certaldese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuthark Revista de Investigación y CulturaSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207