Security: Intrusion Prevention System Using Deep Learning on the Internet of Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet of vehicles supports to transfer of safety-related messages, which help to mitigate road accidents. Internet of vehicles allows vehicle to cooperative communicate, share position and speed data among vehicles and road side units. The vehicular network become prone to large number of attacks including false warnings, mispositioning of vehicles etc. The authentication of messages to identify the normal message packet from attack messages packet and its prevention is a major challenging task. This paper focuses on applying deep learning approach using binary classification to classify the normal packets from malicious packets. The process starts with preparing the training dataset from the open-source KDD99 and CICIDS 2018 datasets, consisting of 1,20,223 network packets with 41 features. The one-dimensional network data is preprocessed using an autoencoder to eliminate the unwanted data in the initial stage. The valuable features are then filtered as 23 out of 41, and the model is trained with structured deep neural networks, then combined with the Softmax classifier and Relu activation functions. The proposed Intrusion prevention model is trained and tested with google Colab, an open platform cloud service, and the open-source tensor flow. The proposed prevention classifier model was validated with the simulation dataset generated in network simulation. The experimental results show 99.57% accuracy, which is the highest among existing RNN and CNN-based models. In the future, the model can be trained on different datasets, which will further improve the model's efficiency and accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".