MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advancement of Photospheric Radius Expansion and Clocked Type-I X-Ray Burst Models with the New <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> Reaction Rate Determined at the Gamow Energy

2021· article· lv· W3192125630 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Hu, H. Yamaguchi, Y. H. Lam, Alexander Heger, D. Kahl, Adam Michael Jacobs, Zac Johnston, Shutao Xu, N. T. Zhang, S. B., L. H. Ru, Enqiang Liu, Tong Liu, S. Hayakawa, Hideki Shimizu, C. B. Hamill, A. St. J. Murphy, Jun Su, Xiao Fang, K. Y. Chae, M. S. Kwag, Nguyễn Ngọc Duy, Nguyen Kim Uyen, Dong H. Kim, R. G. Pizzone, M. La Cognata, S. Cherubini, S. Romano, А. Туміно, J. F. Liang, A. Psaltis, Michele Sferrazza, D. Kim, Yingying Li, S. Kubono

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersRIKENJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research FoundationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMajor State Basic Research Development Program of ChinaAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Foundation of KoreaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyARC Centre of Excellence for All-Sky AstrophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesAcademia SinicaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsRADIUSBacklightEnvelope (radar)AstrophysicsOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the first (in)elastic scattering measurement of $^{25}\mathrm{Al}+p$ with the capability to select and measure in a broad energy range the proton resonances in $^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ contributing to the $^{22}\mathrm{Mg}(\ensuremath{\alpha},p)$ reaction at type I x-ray burst energies. We measured spin-parities of four resonances above the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ threshold of $^{26}\mathrm{Si}$ that are found to strongly impact the $^{22}\mathrm{Mg}(\ensuremath{\alpha},p)$ rate. The new rate advances a state-of-the-art model to remarkably reproduce light curves of the GS $1826--24$ clocked burster with mean deviation $<9%$ and permits us to discover a strong correlation between the He abundance in the accreting envelope of the photospheric radius expansion burster and the dominance of $^{22}\mathrm{Mg}(\ensuremath{\alpha},p)$ branch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207