Feasibility of the TARGET-EFT trial in frail and pre-frail cardiovascular inpatients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Older adults are at risk for hospital-acquired disability and deconditioning, often leading to the "post-hospitalization syndrome" of accelerated functional decline. We hypothesized that this syndrome could be prevented by a pragmatic multi-faceted intervention, and now report the initial experience and feasibility of our ongoing randomized clinical trial. Methods Patients admitted to the cardiovascular ward at a single academic center are screened with the Essential Frailty Toolset (EFT). Those ≥65 years with frailty (EFT: 3-5) or pre-frailty (EFT: 1-2) are eligible for the TARGET-EFT trial, in which they are randomly allocated to usual care or intervention. The intervention is targeted such that patients with physical weakness receive supervised exercise sessions (in addition to clinically-indicated physiotherapy), those with cognitive impairment receive stimulation activities, those with iron deficiency anemia receive intravenous iron sucrose, and those with malnutrition-related hypoalbuminemia receive protein supplements. The outcome is a composite score representing mobility, disability, activity, discomfort, and mood (EQ-5D-5L) ascertained by a blinded observer on the day of discharge and at 30 days post-hospitalization. Results To date, 77 out of a planned 144 patients have been randomized. The most common reasons for exclusion are age <65 years, expected discharge within <3 days and patient refusal. The median age is 80 years and length of stay is 8 days. In each group, 1 patient withdrew and 1 died. There were no intervention-related adverse events. Of the 39 intervention patients, 36 qualified for exercise and received an average of 6 sessions (46% of sessions were deferred because patients were away for tests, were bedrest post-procedures, or refused), 18 received cognitive stimulation, 15 received intravenous iron sucrose, and 16 received protein supplements. Conclusion The TARGET-EFT intervention is feasible and appears safe for frail and pre-frail patients hospitalized with acute cardiovascular disease. Given that nursing staff, physiotherapists, nutritionists and clinicians already address basic cognitive orientation, mobilization and nutritional/iron supplementation needs, it appears that adding targeted interventions for patients’ specific frailty deficits is feasible when shared amongst allied health professionals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".