MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192268142 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000026648

A seven-m6A regulator-related CpG site-based prognostic signature for endometrial carcinoma

2021· article· en· W3192268142 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Zhang, Xuecheng Pang, Yue Huang, Sumin Qian

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomogramMedicineProportional hazards modelOncologyCpG siteEndometrial cancerInternal medicineDNA methylationMethylationRegressionCancerBiologyGeneGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) has become a common gynecologic malignancy with a high mortality. The m6A regulators have been identified to be closely associated with multiple human cancers including EC. However, the CpG methylation signature related to m6A regulators in EC remains unclear. METHOD: The methylation profiles of EC patients including cancer samples and adjacent normal samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The CpG sites in 20 m6A regulators were identified. Univariate Cox regression and LASSO Cox regression analysis were used to screen key CpG sites which were located at m6A regulators and significantly related to the prognosis of EC. The predictive model for EC prognosis was constructed, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to explore whether the risk score derived from the model could function as an independent signature for EC prognosis. Meanwhile, a nomogram model was constructed by combing the independent prognostic signatures for prediction of the long-term survival in EC patients. RESULTS: A total of 396 CpG sites located at 20 m6A regulators were identified. A specific predictive model for EC prognosis based on 7 optimal CpG sites was constructed, which presented good performance in prognosis prediction of EC patients. Moreover, risk score was determined to be an independent signature both in the training set and validation set. By bringing in three independent prognostic factors (age, risk score, and TNM stage), the nomogram was constructed and could effectively predict the 3- and 5-year survival rates of EC patients. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that the CpG sites located at m6A regulators might be considered as potential prognostic signatures for EC patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207