MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192281726 · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000818

An Unusual Enteric Yolk Sac Tumor: First Report of an Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor Associated With a Germline Pathogenic Variant in DICER1

2021· review· en· W3192281726 on OpenAlexaff
W. Glenn McCluggage, Lili Fu, Kristen Mohler, Leanne de Kock, Nelly Sabbaghian, Allison Mindlin, Colin J.R. Stewart, C. Blake Gilks, William D. Foulkes

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health CentreCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermlineBiologyGerm cell tumorsGerm cellSomatic cellGermline mutationYolk sacOvarian cancerCancer researchPathologyMutationMedicineCancerEmbryoGeneticsChemotherapyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variety of unusual tumors are associated with both germline and somatic DICER1 pathogenic variants (PVs), including, in the female genital tract, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma at various sites and ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor. There have been occasional reported cases of ovarian germ cell tumors [mainly yolk sac tumor (YST)] harboring DICER1 PVs but, as far as we are aware, none of these has been proven to have a germline provenance. We report an unusual enteric variant of ovarian YST in a 28-yr-old woman associated with a germline PV c.901C>T (p.Gln301Ter) in exon 7 of DICER1, accompanied by a somatic (YST-only) hotspot mutation: c.5437G>A, p.E1813K. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an ovarian germ cell tumor associated with a germline DICER1 PV. We review other reported cases of ovarian germ cell tumor with DICER1 PVs and discuss the differential diagnosis of this unusual variant of YST which was originally diagnosed as a mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207