Development of an agent-based demographic model of Russia and its supercomputer implementation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Рассмотрено применение агент-ориентированного подхода при моделировании естественного движения населения. Представлена демографическая модель России с учетом ее административного деления, в которой на основе моделирования поведения отдельных членов искусственного общества имитируются процессы смертности, рождаемости и миграции. Для моделирования поведения искусственного общества в целом требуется проведение модельных расчетов с числом агентов до $10^9$ и использование суперкомпьютерных технологий. Важной задачей в таких расчетах становится оптимальное распределение агентов по процессорам кластера. Показано применение декомпозиции модели с использованием алгоритма METIS с учетом основных особенностей агентной модели. Обсуждаются результаты апробации модели. The application of the agent-based modeling approach to the problem of natural human migration is considered. A demographic model of Russia is presented. This model takes into account the administrative division of Russia and simulates the processes of fertility, mortality and migration on the basis of modeling the behavior of individual members of the artificial society. In order to simulate the behavior of the artificial society as a whole, it is necessary to perform numerical experiments with the number of agents up to $10^9$ and to use supercomputer technologies. In such experiments, an important problem is the implementation of an optimal automatic distribution of agents across the cluster processors. The application of model decomposition using the METIS algorithm with consideration of the main features of the agent model is shown. The obtained numerical results are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it