MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192308806 · doi:10.14288/1.0392902

Phylogenetics and evolution of monocot mycoheterotrophs and a newly demonstrated lineage of carnivorous monocots

2021· article· en· W3192308806 on OpenAlexaffabout
Qianshi Lin

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogeneticsLineage (genetic)Evolutionary biologyBiologyPhylogenetic treeBiological evolutionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I used various approaches to investigate mycoheterotrophic and carnivorous monocots, which obtain essential nutrients from soil fungal partners or animal prey, respectively. Fully mycoheterotrophic plants are unable to photosynthesize, and can be difficult to place in plant phylogeny due to substantial morphological modification and elevated substitution rates in all three plant genomes. Mitochondrial genes are expected to be less susceptible to long-branch artefacts in phylogenetic inference than plastid or nuclear genes, as they generally evolve more slowly. I used a phylogenomic approach considering all 37 protein-coding mitochondrial genes to infer the phylogenetic placements of mycoheterotrophic lineages of monocots. I infer that Thismiaceae (excluding Afrothismia) are distantly related to Burmanniaceae, but that fully mycoheterotrophic Afrothismia (Thismiaceae) is the sister group of photosynthetic Taccaceae and core Thismiaceae. The latter finding supports a further independent loss of photosynthesis in Dioscoreales. Scattered distribution of the cox1 intron in distantly related lineages of monocot mycoheterotrophs supports convergent intron gains, potentially consistent with repeated invasions from soil fungal genomes. I demonstrate that Triantha occidentalis (Tofieldiaceae, Alismatales) is a previously overlooked carnivorous lineage with a sticky-trap inflorescence. Field experiments, isotopic data and mixing models demonstrate significant N transfer from prey, with an estimated 68% of leaf N obtained from capture, comparable to levels for co-occurring sundew. Glandular hairs on flowering stems secrete phosphatase, a digestive enzyme seen in other carnivorous plants. Triantha is nearly unique among carnivorous plants in capturing prey on its inflorescence axis close to flowers; however, its glandular hairs capture only small insects. I also studied Triantha phylogeography across its mostly North American range, by surveying 11 plastid-encoded ndh genes from 75 populations. All three North American species are likely monophyletic, although T. occidentalis monophyly requires recognizing T. japonica as a synonym, which is consistent with its nested position in T. occidentalis, as the sister group of populations in Haida Gwaii (Canada). Plastid ndh genes have experienced various degrees of loss or reading frame interruption within T. glutinosa and T. occidentalis, and a strong geographic signal is evident in patterns of ndh gene loss/pseudogenization across the range of T. occidentalis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.149
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology StudiesFrench-language works237,207