MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192327502 · doi:10.1155/2021/3328202

Traffic Light Optimization Based on Modified Webster Function

2021· article· en· W3192327502 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huizhen Zhang, Hongtao Yuan, Youqing Chen, Wenlong Yu, Cheng Wang, Jing Wang, Yueer Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Signal timingTraffic signalSIGNAL (programming language)Genetic algorithmComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationFunction (biology)Traffic congestionControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmSimulationReal-time computingEngineeringMathematicsTransport engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intersection traffic lights are a basic means of ensuring the normal operation of road traffic. A good signal timing scheme is essential for improving traffic congestion. To obtain the signal timing scheme of the designated intersection, the method proposed in this article is based on a modified Webster function. The method uses the signal cycle and proportion of green light duration as independent variables to establish the corresponding intersection vehicle delay function. This function is converted from a multiobjective optimization to a single-objective optimization formulation; a modified genetic algorithm is then used to find the optimal solution to this function. The experimental results show that the timing scheme optimized by the improved genetic algorithm can reduce the intersection delay by nearly 15.64%. The proposed traffic signal timing based on the modified Webster function will be of value as an important reference for the optimization of traffic lights at urban intersections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207