MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192344319 · doi:10.2186/ajps.13.187

Current evidence for IOD and IARPD

2021· article· en· W3192344319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manabu Kanazawa, Maiko Iwaki, Shunsuke Minakuchi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Japan Prosthodontic Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental materials and restorations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)MedicineGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

インプラントオーバーデンチャー(IOD)は,McGillコンセンサスとYorkコンセンサスが発表された前後の2000年以降から急激にエビデンスが積み上げられてきた分野である.IODといってもバリエーションがあり,すでに確立された技術である下顎2-IODを始め,1-IOD,ミニインプラントを利用したミニIOD,アタッチメントの種類によってもさまざまである.また,上顎に対する上顎IODや部分欠損症例に対するImplant assisted removable partial denture (IARPD) の臨床応用も増加している.本稿では2000年以降の臨床研究を中心とした約200本の文献から,以下の項目に沿ってIODとIARPDに関する最新エビデンスを紹介し,現在までにわかっていることについてまとめたい.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.223
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Japan Prosthodontic SocietySame topicDental materials and restorationsFrench-language works237,207