Sengketa Tapal Batas Menurut Hukum Adat (Study di Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Tambrauw Papua Barat)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyebab terjadinya sengketa tapal batas di Distrik Moraid Papua Barat. Kecenderungan masyarakat Adat Distrik Moraid dalam aktivitas sehari hari dan dalam pelbagai hal termasuk proses penerimaan pelayanan dan pengurusan surat menyurat tentang kependudukan sebagian masih dilayani oleh Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sorong sebagai Kabupaten Induk. Menggunakan Pendekatan yuridis sosiologis (Z.Ali,2014) adalah dengan tujuan melihat dan menganalisis aspek aspek hukum yang terjadi dalam masyarakat serta mengidentifikasi masalah yang terjadi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sengketa tapal batas di Distrik Moraid adalah menjadi beban dan tanggung jawab Dewan Adat yang harus diselesaikan secara transparan dan terbuka kepada masyarakat tanpa ada kepentingan dan intervensi dari Pemerintah Daerah kedua wilayah, sehingga dalam keputusan Dewan Adat dapat menjadi rujukan perdamaian dan solusi bagi pihak pihak yang bertikai sesuai dengan kaidah hukum adat dan nilai nilai kearifan lokal yang berlaku.Atau jika belum memenuhi harapan maka dapat melakukan gugatan melalui Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".