Diffusely abnormal white matter converts to T2 lesion volume in the absence of acute inflammation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Diffusely abnormal white matter (DAWM), characterised by biochemical changes of myelin in the absence of frank demyelination, has been associated with clinical progression in secondary progressive MS (SPMS). However, little is known about changes of DAWM over time and their relation to focal white matter lesions (FWML). The objectives of this work were: 1) To characterize the longitudinal evolution of FWML, DAWM, and DAWM that transforms into FWML, and 2) To determine whether gadolinium enhancement, known to be associated with the development of new FWML, is also related to DAWM voxels that transform into FWML. Our data included 4220 MRI scans of 689 SPMS participants, followed for 156 weeks and 2677 scans of 686 RRMS participants, followed for 96 weeks. FWML and DAWM were segmented using a previously validated, automatic thresholding technique based on normalized T2 intensity values. Using longitudinally registered images, DAWM voxels at each visit that transformed into FWML on the last MRI scan as well as their overlap with gadolinium enhancing lesion masks were identified. Our results showed that the average yearly rate of conversion of DAWM-to-FWML was 1.27cc for SPMS and 0.80cc for RRMS. FWML in SPMS participants significantly increased (t=3.9; p=0.0001) while DAWM significantly decreased (t=-4.3 p<0.0001) and the ratio FWML:DAWM increased (t=12.7; p<0.00001). RRMS participants also showed an increase in the FWML:DAWM Ratio (t=6.9; p<0.00001) but without a significant change of the individual volumes. Gadolinium enhancement was associated with 7.3% and 18.7% of focal New T2 lesion formation in the infrequent scans of the RRMS and SPMS cohorts, respectively. In comparison, only 0.1% and 0.0% of DAWM-to-FWML voxels overlapped with gadolinium enhancement. We conclude that DAWM transforms into FWML over time, in both RRMS and SPMS. DAWM appears to represent a form of pre-lesional pathology that contributes to T2 lesion volume increase over time, independent of new focal inflammation and gadolinium enhancement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".