Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of 295 Patients With Relapsing Polychondritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This study analyzes the clinical features of Chinese patients with relapsing polychondritis (RP). Methods The clinical data of 295 patients with RP at Beijing Tongren Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results The mean age of onset was 41.0 ± 15.0 years. The sex ratio was 1:1. Up to 70.5% of the patients had airway involvement during the disease course; among them, the larynx was most commonly affected (82.2%). One-quarter (25.7%) of the patients with laryngeal involvement underwent tracheotomy as a result of progressive dyspnea or acute laryngeal obstruction. Younger age at onset and respiratory symptoms at initial presentation were independent risk factors for tracheotomy in patients with RP with laryngeal involvement. The risk of tracheotomy in patients who presented with respiratory symptoms was 2.35 times higher than that of patients who presented with other symptoms (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.23–4.50,P= 0.01). The risk of tracheotomy increased by 4.8% for every 1-year decrease in the age at onset (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.97,P< 0.001). The incidence of lower respiratory tract infection was much higher in patients with airway involvement than in those without airway involvement. The main cause of death was respiratory failure as a result of airway obstruction. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of airway involvement in Chinese patients with RP. Laryngeal involvement is associated with a high risk of death. More attention should be paid to patients with RP with laryngeal involvement who are young at disease onset and present with respiratory symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".